Who runs this mag anyway, Superchevy??

It's not an FE engine - idiots!

jb  

Would you care to elaborate on your comment? Like, what issue, what story, etc?

Mark  

Front page of this web site.

Highlighted article....

it's your web site, right?

here's the link

http://www.mustangandfords.com/projectbuild/mufp_0604_ford_mustang_engine_build/index.html  

Maybe this will help

Ford Mustang 514ci FE Engine Build - Big-Block Power Swap
Classic Creations and Jon Barrett Hot Rod Engines Team Up to Pump 514 ci Into a Mustang Sedan Delivery Battle Wagon


writer: Jim Smart
photographer: Mark Houlahan, Donald Farr, Manufacturers



I have to crack up laughing at the author - Jim "Smart" claiming a 460 stroker is an FE.  

Looks like the web master titled it wrong when it was re-formated for the web site.  The article is correct inside and I'm pretty sure Jim and the others know the difference.  

Thanks for the link. Yes, the title you are referring to is created by the web producers. They are not always as automotive inclined as the print editors. We're lucky in that Greg Clark, our web producer, has more automotive knowledge than some of the guys they hire, and he's a Ford guy to boot, but I guess not a big-block kind of guy.

As Falcon states, the print story IS correct. Thanks for the heads up and I'll get Greg to change it ASAP...

Greg also runs five other sites of ours, so while it may have been an engine ID mistake, at least he didn't copy and paste something from Mopar Muscle's site! Egad!  

They say assumption is the mother of all... well you know.

Why was that put in to the web story? When we post it on the web, we want to include as many relevant keywords in the story title, etc. so it'll show up on Google and other search engines.

Anyway, I've removed all references to FE in the story. It might take a bit for the change to show on the site. But I'll get it corrected as soon as I can.

Sorry for the mess up.

Oh, and for the record. I'd rather walk than own a bowtie!